1. GAP ANALYSES
The different members of the team to be interviewed all have their own vision on how mature the different processes are.
The processes on which they are interviewed are displayed below.
| Proces | As Is | To Be | |
| 3 | Control asset data | 2.3 | 2.5 |
| 4 | Risk inventory and analysis | 2.1 | 2.5 |
| 5 | Managing the maintenance concepts | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| 6 | Manage long term asset plan | 2.8 | 2.5 |
| 7 | Manage the project portfolio and annual plans | 2.4 | 2.5 |
| 8 | Manage programs and contract | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| 9 | Monitoring of performance and costs | 2.2 | 2.5 |
fig. 3.3, Asset Management Process
The interviewed we asked to fill in the maturity level on every step of the 7 processes.
All processes are described in different steps of the process as put in the process flow charts in appendix I.
In the process of filling in the actual current maturity level the system had to be explained to all different stakeholders. Therefore a meeting was organised in which the complete blueprint was explained to all members of the asset management team. The explanation was supported by a power point presentation which is shown in appendix IV.
Score
The outcome of the score filled in by the asset management team is compared with the input the team and the management have given for the desired maturity level.
The management spoke out that they want to be on 50% of the maximum score by the end of the year 2016 of all management processes. 50% in the scale 0 till 4 would mean 2.5
Detailed team scores are displayed in appendix III.
The “as is” situation is as follows: